Comparing Traditional and Modern Approaches to Early Care

Comparing Traditional and Modern Approaches to Early Care

Importance of Early Orthodontic Evaluation

Early orthodontic treatment has long been a cornerstone of dental care, with traditional approaches offering foundational strategies to correct dental irregularities and improve oral health. These conventional methods have paved the way for modern advancements, yet they still hold significant relevance today. Jaw growth issues are easier to correct at an early age Orthodontics for young children health care. In comparing traditional and modern approaches to early orthodontic treatment, we gain insight into how time-tested techniques continue to influence contemporary practices while also recognizing the innovations that are reshaping the field.


Traditional orthodontics primarily focuses on addressing issues such as overcrowding, malocclusion, and jaw misalignment during childhood or adolescence. The goal is to guide proper jaw growth and ensure adequate space for incoming permanent teeth. One of the most common methods involves using metal braces, which consist of brackets affixed to the teeth and connected by wires that apply gentle pressure over time. This approach effectively corrects various dental problems, aligning teeth into their desired positions.


In addition to braces, other traditional techniques include functional appliances like headgear or retainers. These devices are designed to modify jaw growth or maintain tooth alignment after braces are removed. While these methods may not be as aesthetically pleasing or comfortable as modern solutions, they have proven successful for decades in achieving desired orthodontic outcomes.


The strengths of traditional approaches lie in their reliability and effectiveness. They provide a solid framework for correcting complex bite issues and are supported by extensive clinical research and evidence-based practice. Moreover, these treatments typically involve a comprehensive plan developed by an experienced orthodontist who carefully monitors progress over several years.


However, traditional methods also come with limitations. Metal braces can be uncomfortable and require diligent oral hygiene practices to prevent decay around brackets and wires. Additionally, longer treatment times are often necessary compared to some modern alternatives.


As we compare these conventional techniques with contemporary advancements in early orthodontic care, it's clear that both have unique advantages. Modern technology has introduced innovative solutions such as clear aligners-removable trays made from transparent plastic-that offer a more discreet option for straightening teeth without compromising on effectiveness. Furthermore, digital imaging and 3D printing technologies allow for customized treatments tailored specifically to each patient's needs.


Despite these innovations, the essence of early orthodontic intervention remains rooted in principles established by traditional methods: prevention is key; identifying problems early leads to more efficient resolutions; collaboration between patients and practitioners yields optimal results.


In conclusion, while modern developments have transformed many aspects of early orthodontic care through convenience and aesthetics improvements like invisible aligners or accelerated treatments using advanced materials-the core objectives remain consistent across both eras-to achieve healthy smiles through personalized attention based on individual needs assessed at critical stages during childhood development phases when interventions prove most beneficial due largely because they capitalize upon naturally occurring growth spurts which facilitate desired changes within facial structures ultimately resulting healthier lifetime benefits beyond mere cosmetic appearances alone thereby underscoring importance ongoing commitment towards maintaining overall wellness throughout one's life journey enriched greatly via proactive engagement within this vital domain healthcare service provision offered globally today!

The field of pediatric orthodontics has witnessed significant advancements over the years, with modern techniques offering revolutionary changes in early care compared to traditional approaches. As we delve into comparing these methodologies, it becomes evident that each holds its unique merits and challenges.


Traditionally, pediatric orthodontics often relied on observational strategies, where orthodontists would monitor a child's dental development until all permanent teeth had erupted. This method prioritized passive observation over intervention, frequently resulting in comprehensive treatment plans during the pre-teen or teenage years. The focus was primarily on correcting malocclusions and aligning teeth using metal braces or retainers once the child's oral structures were fully developed. While effective, this approach often required longer treatment durations and sometimes involved more invasive procedures due to accumulated dental issues over time.


Modern techniques in pediatric orthodontics have shifted towards earlier intervention, guided by a preventive philosophy. Today's orthodontists emphasize the importance of addressing potential dental problems as they arise rather than waiting for them to manifest fully. This proactive mindset is facilitated by technological innovations such as 3D imaging and digital modeling, which allow for precise diagnosis and custom-tailored treatment plans at an early age.


One of the remarkable advancements in modern orthodontics is the use of clear aligners for children, which are not only more aesthetically pleasing but also provide comfort and flexibility compared to traditional braces. Additionally, interceptive treatments like space maintainers or expanders can guide jaw growth and ensure enough room for erupting teeth, effectively preventing more severe misalignments.


Moreover, contemporary practices emphasize patient-centered care that considers a child's psychological well-being alongside their physical needs. Modern appliances are designed to be less intrusive and more comfortable, reducing anxiety associated with wearing braces-a common concern among young patients.


Despite these advancements, it is crucial to acknowledge that modern techniques do not entirely replace traditional methods but rather complement them within a broader spectrum of care options. Some cases may still require conventional braces or surgical interventions depending on individual circumstances.


In conclusion, comparing traditional and modern approaches in pediatric orthodontics reveals a landscape transformed by innovation while rooted in tried-and-true methods. Modern techniques offer early intervention opportunities that can lead to shorter treatment times and improved outcomes while maintaining a child-friendly approach to dental care. Ultimately, the integration of both old and new paradigms equips orthodontists with a versatile toolkit tailored to meet diverse patient needs effectively.

Benefits of Early Intervention in Orthodontics

In recent years, the debate surrounding early childhood education has intensified, with educators and parents alike comparing traditional methods to modern approaches. This dialogue is crucial as it directly impacts how we nurture the youngest members of our society during their most formative years. Both traditional and modern methods have distinct philosophies and practices that significantly influence children's learning experiences. Understanding their effectiveness requires a nuanced exploration of their respective strengths and potential drawbacks.


Traditional early care methods are often characterized by structured routines, teacher-led instruction, and an emphasis on foundational skills such as reading, writing, and arithmetic. These approaches have been instrumental in establishing basic educational frameworks that prioritize discipline and respect for authority figures. Proponents argue that traditional methods provide children with a solid foundation necessary for future academic success. The predictability of routine can offer young learners a sense of security, helping them develop focus and self-discipline.


However, critics assert that traditional methods may stifle creativity and limit the opportunities for exploratory learning. In contrast, modern approaches to early care emphasize child-centered learning environments where play-based activities are central. These methods encourage critical thinking, problem-solving skills, and social interaction among peers. Modern educators advocate for a more holistic approach that considers emotional development alongside cognitive growth.


One significant advantage of modern methodologies is their adaptability to individual learning styles and needs. By fostering an environment where curiosity is encouraged rather than curbed, children can engage deeply with subjects they find intriguing. This personalized learning experience can lead to increased motivation and enthusiasm for education overall.


Despite these benefits, some opponents argue that modern approaches may lack the rigor needed to prepare children adequately for the structured demands of formal schooling later on. They worry about potential gaps in essential skills if too much emphasis is placed on unstructured play without clear educational objectives.


Ultimately, the effectiveness of either method depends largely on its implementation context-the specific needs of the child population it serves-and striking an appropriate balance between structure and flexibility. A hybrid model that integrates both traditional elements like routine with modern strategies such as play-based learning could potentially offer the best outcomes.


In conclusion, neither traditional nor modern early care approaches can claim universal superiority; each has unique contributions to make toward nurturing well-rounded individuals ready to face future challenges confidently. As we continue this conversation about what constitutes effective early childhood education today-and tomorrow-it's vital we maintain open channels for dialogue among educators while remaining attentive to evolving research insights into child development dynamics.

Benefits of Early Intervention in Orthodontics

Overview of Comprehensive Orthodontic Strategies

When discussing early childhood care, one cannot overlook the pivotal elements of safety and comfort. These considerations are crucial as they directly impact a child's well-being and developmental trajectory. The approaches to ensuring these aspects have evolved significantly over time, reflecting broader shifts in societal attitudes, technological advancements, and pedagogical insights.


Traditional approaches to early care often emphasized routine and familiarity. In these settings, safety was largely about creating consistent environments where children knew what to expect. Caregivers focused on physical safety, such as childproofing spaces to prevent accidents and maintaining strict hygiene protocols to ward off illness. Comfort was provided through predictable schedules that aimed to offer children a sense of security through repetition - regular meal times, nap times, and playtimes formed the backbone of daily routines.


However, traditional methods sometimes lacked flexibility and could be less responsive to individual children's needs. While they offered a stable environment, there wasn't always room for personalization or adaptation based on the unique preferences or emotional requirements of each child.


In contrast, modern approaches to early childhood care place a greater emphasis on individualized attention and holistic development. Safety is now viewed through a broader lens that includes not only physical but also emotional well-being. Modern caregivers are trained to recognize signs of stress or discomfort in children and respond with sensitivity. This approach often incorporates newer technologies-like advanced monitoring systems-to enhance both safety standards and peace of mind for parents.


Comfort in contemporary settings is achieved by creating environments that stimulate creativity and learning while still providing warmth and security. Modern facilities might feature adaptable spaces that change according to different activities or incorporate sensory-friendly designs catering to various needs. The focus is on fostering an inclusive atmosphere where every child feels valued and supported.


Moreover, modern methodologies often involve parents more directly in their child's care plan. Open communication channels between caregivers and families ensure that children's routines can be adjusted as necessary to fit personal circumstances or developmental milestones.


Ultimately, both traditional and modern approaches aim to create nurturing environments where children can thrive safely. Yet the evolution from structured predictability towards personalized adaptability marks a significant shift in how society views early childhood care. By blending tried-and-true practices with innovative strategies, today's caregivers strive to balance safety with comfort in ways that respect each child's individuality while promoting overall growth.


In conclusion, whether adhering strictly to time-honored routines or embracing more contemporary methodologies, the fundamental goal remains unchanged: ensuring that children are safe, comfortable, and well-equipped for the future challenges they will face as they grow into adulthood.

Role of Technology in Modern Pediatric Orthodontics

When considering the realm of early childhood care, the comparison between traditional and modern approaches often revolves around two crucial aspects: cost implications and accessibility. These dimensions significantly influence decision-making for both parents and caregivers. Understanding these factors can help shed light on how each approach aligns with different family needs and societal structures.


Traditional early care approaches, such as home-based care or small community setups, typically rely on long-established practices that emphasize personalized attention. The cost implications of these setups can vary widely. On one hand, they may be less expensive due to fewer overhead costs compared to larger institutions. For instance, a caregiver operating from their home might not have the same facility expenses as a modern daycare center. However, this affordability can come at the expense of limited resources for learning materials or professional development for caregivers.


Accessibility in traditional settings often depends largely on location and availability of qualified personnel within a community. In rural or underserved areas, finding a high-quality traditional caregiver may be challenging, thereby limiting access for families who prefer this approach. Furthermore, these models may lack standardized curriculum or regulatory oversight, which could impact consistency in care quality.


In contrast, modern approaches to early care often come with structured environments like daycare centers or preschools that emphasize educational curricula alongside caregiving. The cost implications here are usually higher due to investments in facilities, educational materials, and trained staff. Parents might find themselves facing significant financial burdens unless subsidies or financial assistance programs are available.


Accessibility in modern approaches tends to be broader due to an increasing number of facilities catering to diverse family needs across urban and suburban areas. These centers are often regulated by government standards ensuring minimum levels of quality and safety, thus providing parents with some assurance about the level of care their children will receive.


Despite higher costs, modern approaches frequently offer added conveniences such as extended hours or specialized programs that cater to working parents' schedules-elements that increase accessibility for dual-income households or single parents balancing work commitments with childcare responsibilities.


Ultimately, choosing between traditional and modern early care approaches involves weighing cost against convenience and quality against personalization. Families must consider their financial capacity alongside their desire for specific types of interaction and learning environments for their children.


While both systems have unique benefits and drawbacks concerning cost implications and accessibility, it's essential that policymakers continue working towards making all forms of early childcare more affordable and accessible through subsidies, grants, or other support mechanisms designed to bridge gaps in service delivery across different demographics.


By doing so, society can ensure that every child receives nurturing care during these formative years regardless of parental income level or geographic location-a goal that benefits individuals as well as communities at large by laying strong foundations for future success.

Tips for Parents: Ensuring Successful Orthodontic Outcomes for Children

In recent years, the landscape of early childhood care has evolved dramatically. As society progresses and new research emerges, parents are faced with a myriad of options for their children's upbringing. The debate between traditional and modern approaches to early care is pivotal in shaping parental perspectives and satisfaction levels.


Traditional early care methods often emphasize structured environments rooted in long-standing practices. These approaches typically focus on direct instruction, routine-based activities, and established curriculums that have been used over generations. Many parents find comfort in such methods due to their familiarity and predictability. For some, the idea that these practices have stood the test of time offers reassurance that they provide a solid foundation for their children's development.


On the other hand, modern approaches to early care incorporate contemporary educational theories and innovative practices aimed at fostering holistic development. These methods often prioritize child-led learning experiences, flexibility, and an emphasis on emotional intelligence alongside cognitive skills. Parents attracted to modern approaches may appreciate the adaptability of these programs to individual children's needs and the encouragement of creativity and critical thinking from an early age.


Parental satisfaction with either approach largely hinges on personal values, expectations, and past experiences. For those who value tradition and structure, witnessing their child thrive within a conventional framework can lead to high levels of satisfaction. However, some parents might feel constrained by the rigidity of traditional methods if they perceive them as limiting their child's potential or individuality.


Conversely, parents who value innovation and flexibility might express higher satisfaction with modern approaches that align with progressive educational philosophies. They often appreciate environments where their children can explore diverse interests at their own pace. However, challenges arise when these parents encounter difficulties balancing open-ended exploration with necessary skill acquisition milestones.


Ultimately, parental perspectives on early care are influenced by a combination of cultural background, personal beliefs about education and child-rearing, as well as practical considerations such as cost or convenience. Satisfaction levels are highest when parents feel that their choice aligns with both their aspirations for their child's future and the immediate happiness of seeing them engaged and content in their learning environment.


The ongoing dialogue between proponents of traditional versus modern early care highlights an essential truth: there is no one-size-fits-all solution in nurturing young minds. As more research continues to shed light on effective practices across both spectrums, it becomes increasingly important for caregivers to listen actively to parental concerns while providing informed guidance tailored to individual family needs.


In conclusion, understanding parental perspectives requires recognizing the diversity inherent in family dynamics today. Whether leaning towards traditional or modern methodologies-or finding a harmonious blend-parents ultimately seek assurance that they are making choices conducive not only to academic success but also to overall well-being for their children during these formative years.

In recent years, the field of orthodontics has witnessed a transformative evolution, particularly in early orthodontic care. As we stand at the crossroads of tradition and innovation, it is imperative to compare traditional and modern approaches to understand future trends shaping this vital aspect of dental health.


Traditional early orthodontic care primarily focused on addressing issues once all permanent teeth had erupted. This approach often involved using conventional braces and relied heavily on mechanical methods to correct malocclusions and align teeth. While effective, it typically meant that children would not begin treatment until their teenage years, potentially allowing minor problems to escalate into more significant issues over time.


In contrast, modern approaches advocate for interceptive orthodontics-an intervention strategy that begins much earlier in a child's life. This proactive stance allows orthodontists to guide jaw growth, manage space for erupting teeth, and reduce the need for complex treatments later on. The advent of advanced diagnostic tools such as digital imaging and 3D modeling has revolutionized how practitioners assess and plan treatment strategies. These technologies enable precise monitoring of dental development from an early age, facilitating timely interventions that are less invasive yet highly effective.


Moreover, innovations such as clear aligners have introduced a level of flexibility and comfort previously unattainable with traditional braces. They are aesthetically appealing and can be employed earlier in life to gently guide dental structures into place without the social stigma sometimes associated with metal braces.


Looking ahead, one emerging trend is the integration of artificial intelligence in treatment planning. AI algorithms can analyze vast amounts of data quickly and accurately predict treatment outcomes based on individual patient profiles. This capability promises not only to enhance precision but also personalize care plans more comprehensively than ever before.


Another promising direction is the focus on holistic care models that encompass not just dental alignment but overall craniofacial development. Understanding how factors like breathing patterns or oral habits influence dental health could lead to more comprehensive care strategies that promote better long-term outcomes.


In conclusion, while traditional approaches laid the foundation for effective orthodontic care, modern techniques offer enhanced possibilities through technological advancements and a deeper understanding of developmental biology. As these new methodologies continue to evolve, they promise a future where early orthodontic care is more personalized, efficient, and integral to ensuring lifelong oral health. Embracing these changes will require continued education and adaptation by professionals within the field but holds immense potential for improving patient experiences and outcomes alike.

Orthodontics
Connecting the arch-wire on brackets with wire
Occupation
Names Orthodontist
Occupation type
 Specialty
Activity sectors
 Dentistry
Description
Education required
 Dental degree, specialty training
Fields of
employment
 Private practices, hospitals

Orthodontics[a][b] is a dentistry specialty that addresses the diagnosis, prevention, management, and correction of mal-positioned teeth and jaws, as well as misaligned bite patterns.[2] It may also address the modification of facial growth, known as dentofacial orthopedics.

Abnormal alignment of the teeth and jaws is very common. The approximate worldwide prevalence of malocclusion was as high as 56%.[3] However, conclusive scientific evidence for the health benefits of orthodontic treatment is lacking, although patients with completed treatment have reported a higher quality of life than that of untreated patients undergoing orthodontic treatment.[4][5] The main reason for the prevalence of these malocclusions is diets with less fresh fruit and vegetables and overall softer foods in childhood, causing smaller jaws with less room for the teeth to erupt.[6] Treatment may require several months to a few years and entails using dental braces and other appliances to gradually adjust tooth position and jaw alignment. In cases where the malocclusion is severe, jaw surgery may be incorporated into the treatment plan. Treatment usually begins before a person reaches adulthood, insofar as pre-adult bones may be adjusted more easily before adulthood.

History

[edit]

Though it was rare until the Industrial Revolution,[7] there is evidence of the issue of overcrowded, irregular, and protruding teeth afflicting individuals. Evidence from Greek and Etruscan materials suggests that attempts to treat this disorder date back to 1000 BC, showcasing primitive yet impressively well-crafted orthodontic appliances. In the 18th and 19th centuries, a range of devices for the "regulation" of teeth were described by various dentistry authors who occasionally put them into practice.[8] As a modern science, orthodontics dates back to the mid-1800s.[9] The field's influential contributors include Norman William Kingsley[9] (1829–1913) and Edward Angle[10] (1855–1930). Angle created the first basic system for classifying malocclusions, a system that remains in use today.[9]

Beginning in the mid-1800s, Norman Kingsley published Oral Deformities, which is now credited as one of the first works to begin systematically documenting orthodontics. Being a major presence in American dentistry during the latter half of the 19th century, not only was Kingsley one of the early users of extraoral force to correct protruding teeth, but he was also one of the pioneers for treating cleft palates and associated issues. During the era of orthodontics under Kingsley and his colleagues, the treatment was focused on straightening teeth and creating facial harmony. Ignoring occlusal relationships, it was typical to remove teeth for a variety of dental issues, such as malalignment or overcrowding. The concept of an intact dentition was not widely appreciated in those days, making bite correlations seem irrelevant.[8]

In the late 1800s, the concept of occlusion was essential for creating reliable prosthetic replacement teeth. This idea was further refined and ultimately applied in various ways when dealing with healthy dental structures as well. As these concepts of prosthetic occlusion progressed, it became an invaluable tool for dentistry.[8]

It was in 1890 that the work and impact of Dr. Edwards H. Angle began to be felt, with his contribution to modern orthodontics particularly noteworthy. Initially focused on prosthodontics, he taught in Pennsylvania and Minnesota before directing his attention towards dental occlusion and the treatments needed to maintain it as a normal condition, thus becoming known as the "father of modern orthodontics".[8]

By the beginning of the 20th century, orthodontics had become more than just the straightening of crooked teeth. The concept of ideal occlusion, as postulated by Angle and incorporated into a classification system, enabled a shift towards treating malocclusion, which is any deviation from normal occlusion.[8] Having a full set of teeth on both arches was highly sought after in orthodontic treatment due to the need for exact relationships between them. Extraction as an orthodontic procedure was heavily opposed by Angle and those who followed him. As occlusion became the key priority, facial proportions and aesthetics were neglected. To achieve ideal occlusals without using external forces, Angle postulated that having perfect occlusion was the best way to gain optimum facial aesthetics.[8]

With the passing of time, it became quite evident that even an exceptional occlusion was not suitable when considered from an aesthetic point of view. Not only were there issues related to aesthetics, but it usually proved impossible to keep a precise occlusal relationship achieved by forcing teeth together over extended durations with the use of robust elastics, something Angle and his students had previously suggested. Charles Tweed[11] in America and Raymond Begg[12] in Australia (who both studied under Angle) re-introduced dentistry extraction into orthodontics during the 1940s and 1950s so they could improve facial esthetics while also ensuring better stability concerning occlusal relationships.[13]

In the postwar period, cephalometric radiography[14] started to be used by orthodontists for measuring changes in tooth and jaw position caused by growth and treatment.[15] The x-rays showed that many Class II and III malocclusions were due to improper jaw relations as opposed to misaligned teeth. It became evident that orthodontic therapy could adjust mandibular development, leading to the formation of functional jaw orthopedics in Europe and extraoral force measures in the US. These days, both functional appliances and extraoral devices are applied around the globe with the aim of amending growth patterns and forms. Consequently, pursuing true, or at least improved, jaw relationships had become the main objective of treatment by the mid-20th century.[8]

At the beginning of the twentieth century, orthodontics was in need of an upgrade. The American Journal of Orthodontics was created for this purpose in 1915; before it, there were no scientific objectives to follow, nor any precise classification system and brackets that lacked features.[16]

Until the mid-1970s, braces were made by wrapping metal around each tooth.[9] With advancements in adhesives, it became possible to instead bond metal brackets to the teeth.[9]

In 1972, Lawrence F. Andrews gave an insightful definition of the ideal occlusion in permanent teeth. This has had meaningful effects on orthodontic treatments that are administered regularly,[16] and these are: 1. Correct interarchal relationships 2. Correct crown angulation (tip) 3. Correct crown inclination (torque) 4. No rotations 5. Tight contact points 6. Flat Curve of Spee (0.0–2.5 mm),[17] and based on these principles, he discovered a treatment system called the straight-wire appliance system, or the pre-adjusted edgewise system. Introduced in 1976, Larry Andrews' pre-adjusted edgewise appliance, more commonly known as the straight wire appliance, has since revolutionized fixed orthodontic treatment. The advantage of the design lies in its bracket and archwire combination, which requires only minimal wire bending from the orthodontist or clinician. It's aptly named after this feature: the angle of the slot and thickness of the bracket base ultimately determine where each tooth is situated with little need for extra manipulation.[18][19][20]

Prior to the invention of a straight wire appliance, orthodontists were utilizing a non-programmed standard edgewise fixed appliance system, or Begg's pin and tube system. Both of these systems employed identical brackets for each tooth and necessitated the bending of an archwire in three planes for locating teeth in their desired positions, with these bends dictating ultimate placements.[18]

Evolution of the current orthodontic appliances

[edit]

When it comes to orthodontic appliances, they are divided into two types: removable and fixed. Removable appliances can be taken on and off by the patient as required. On the other hand, fixed appliances cannot be taken off as they remain bonded to the teeth during treatment.

Fixed appliances

[edit]

Fixed orthodontic appliances are predominantly derived from the edgewise appliance approach, which typically begins with round wires before transitioning to rectangular archwires for improving tooth alignment. These rectangluar wires promote precision in the positioning of teeth following initial treatment. In contrast to the Begg appliance, which was based solely on round wires and auxiliary springs, the Tip-Edge system emerged in the early 21st century. This innovative technology allowed for the utilization of rectangular archwires to precisely control tooth movement during the finishing stages after initial treatment with round wires. Thus, almost all modern fixed appliances can be considered variations on this edgewise appliance system.

Early 20th-century orthodontist Edward Angle made a major contribution to the world of dentistry. He created four distinct appliance systems that have been used as the basis for many orthodontic treatments today, barring a few exceptions. They are E-arch, pin and tube, ribbon arch, and edgewise systems.

E-arch

[edit]

Edward H. Angle made a significant contribution to the dental field when he released the 7th edition of his book in 1907, which outlined his theories and detailed his technique. This approach was founded upon the iconic "E-Arch" or 'the-arch' shape as well as inter-maxillary elastics.[21] This device was different from any other appliance of its period as it featured a rigid framework to which teeth could be tied effectively in order to recreate an arch form that followed pre-defined dimensions.[22] Molars were fitted with braces, and a powerful labial archwire was positioned around the arch. The wire ended in a thread, and to move it forward, an adjustable nut was used, which allowed for an increase in circumference. By ligation, each individual tooth was attached to this expansive archwire.[8]

Pin and tube appliance

[edit]

Due to its limited range of motion, Angle was unable to achieve precise tooth positioning with an E-arch. In order to bypass this issue, he started using bands on other teeth combined with a vertical tube for each individual tooth. These tubes held a soldered pin, which could be repositioned at each appointment in order to move them in place.[8] Dubbed the "bone-growing appliance", this contraption was theorized to encourage healthier bone growth due to its potential for transferring force directly to the roots.[23] However, implementing it proved troublesome in reality.

Ribbon arch

[edit]

Realizing that the pin and tube appliance was not easy to control, Angle developed a better option, the ribbon arch, which was much simpler to use. Most of its components were already prepared by the manufacturer, so it was significantly easier to manage than before. In order to attach the ribbon arch, the occlusal area of the bracket was opened. Brackets were only added to eight incisors and mandibular canines, as it would be impossible to insert the arch into both horizontal molar tubes and the vertical brackets of adjacent premolars. This lack of understanding posed a considerable challenge to dental professionals; they were unable to make corrections to an excessive Spee curve in bicuspid teeth.[24] Despite the complexity of the situation, it was necessary for practitioners to find a resolution. Unparalleled to its counterparts, what made the ribbon arch instantly popular was that its archwire had remarkable spring qualities and could be utilized to accurately align teeth that were misaligned. However, a major drawback of this device was its inability to effectively control root position since it did not have enough resilience to generate the torque movements required for setting roots in their new place.[8]

Edgewise appliance

[edit]

In an effort to rectify the issues with the ribbon arch, Angle shifted the orientation of its slot from vertical, instead making it horizontal. In addition, he swapped out the wire and replaced it with a precious metal wire that was rotated by 90 degrees in relation—henceforth known as Edgewise.[25] Following extensive trials, it was concluded that dimensions of 22 × 28 mils were optimal for obtaining excellent control over crown and root positioning across all three planes of space.[26] After debuting in 1928, this appliance quickly became one of the mainstays for multibanded fixed therapy, although ribbon arches continued to be utilized for another decade or so beyond this point too.[8]

Labiolingual

[edit]

Prior to Angle, the idea of fitting attachments on individual teeth had not been thought of, and in his lifetime, his concern for precisely positioning each tooth was not highly appraised. In addition to using fingersprings for repositioning teeth with a range of removable devices, two main appliance systems were very popular in the early part of the 20th century. Labiolingual appliances use bands on the first molars joined with heavy lingual and labial archwires affixed with soldered fingersprings to shift single teeth.

Twin wire

[edit]

Utilizing bands around both incisors and molars, a twin-wire appliance was designed to provide alignment between these teeth. Constructed with two 10-mil steel archwires, its delicate features were safeguarded by lengthy tubes stretching from molars towards canines. Despite its efforts, it had limited capacity for movement without further modifications, rendering it obsolete in modern orthodontic practice.

Begg's Appliance

[edit]

Returning to Australia in the 1920s, the renowned orthodontist, Raymond Begg, applied his knowledge of ribbon arch appliances, which he had learned from the Angle School. On top of this, Begg recognized that extracting teeth was sometimes vital for successful outcomes and sought to modify the ribbon arch appliance to provide more control when dealing with root positioning. In the late 1930s, Begg developed his adaptation of the appliance, which took three forms. Firstly, a high-strength 16-mil round stainless steel wire replaced the original precious metal ribbon arch. Secondly, he kept the same ribbon arch bracket but inverted it so that it pointed toward the gums instead of away from them. Lastly, auxiliary springs were added to control root movement. This resulted in what would come to be known as the Begg Appliance. With this design, friction was decreased since contact between wire and bracket was minimal, and binding was minimized due to tipping and uprighting being used for anchorage control, which lessened contact angles between wires and corners of the bracket.

Tip-Edge System

[edit]

Begg's influence is still seen in modern appliances, such as Tip-Edge brackets. This type of bracket incorporates a rectangular slot cutaway on one side to allow for crown tipping with no incisal deflection of an archwire, allowing teeth to be tipped during space closure and then uprighted through auxiliary springs or even a rectangular wire for torque purposes in finishing. At the initial stages of treatment, small-diameter steel archwires should be used when working with Tip-Edge brackets.

Contemporary edgewise systems

[edit]

Throughout time, there has been a shift in which appliances are favored by dentists. In particular, during the 1960s, when it was introduced, the Begg appliance gained wide popularity due to its efficiency compared to edgewise appliances of that era; it could produce the same results with less investment on the dentist's part. Nevertheless, since then, there have been advances in technology and sophistication in edgewise appliances, which led to the opposite conclusion: nowadays, edgewise appliances are more efficient than the Begg appliance, thus explaining why it is commonly used.

Automatic rotational control

[edit]

At the beginning, Angle attached eyelets to the edges of archwires so that they could be held with ligatures and help manage rotations. Now, however, no extra ligature is needed due to either twin brackets or single brackets that have added wings touching underneath the wire (Lewis or Lang brackets). Both types of brackets simplify the process of obtaining moments that control movements along a particular plane of space.

Alteration in bracket slot dimensions

[edit]

In modern dentistry, two types of edgewise appliances exist: the 18- and 22-slot varieties. While these appliances are used differently, the introduction of a 20-slot device with more precise features has been considered but not pursued yet.[27]

Straight-wire bracket prescriptions

[edit]

Rather than rely on the same bracket for all teeth, L.F. Andrews found a way to make different brackets for each tooth in the 1980s, thanks to the increased convenience of bonding.[28] This adjustment enabled him to avoid having multiple bends in archwires that would have been needed to make up for variations in tooth anatomy. Ultimately, this led to what was termed a "straight-wire appliance" system – an edgewise appliance that greatly enhanced its efficiency.[29] The modern edgewise appliance has slightly different construction than the original one. Instead of relying on faciolingual bends to accommodate variations among teeth, each bracket has a correspondingly varying base thickness depending on the tooth it is intended for. However, due to individual differences between teeth, this does not completely eliminate the need for compensating bends.[30] Accurately placing the roots of many teeth requires angling brackets in relation to the long axis of the tooth. Traditionally, this mesiodistal root positioning necessitated using second-order, or tip, bends along the archwire. However, angling the bracket or bracket slot eliminates this need for bends.

Given the discrepancies in inclination of facial surfaces across individual teeth, placing a twist, otherwise known as third-order or torque bends, into segments of each rectangular archwire was initially required with the edgewise appliance. These bends were necessary for all patients and wires, not just to avoid any unintentional movement of suitably placed teeth or when moving roots facially or lingually. Angulation of either brackets or slots can minimize the need for second-order or tip bends on archwires. Contemporary edgewise appliances come with brackets designed to adjust for any facial inclinations, thereby eliminating or reducing any third-order bends. These brackets already have angulation and torque values built in so that each rectangluar archwire can be contorted to form a custom fit without inadvertently shifting any correctly positioned teeth. Without bracket angulation and torque, second-order or tip bends would still be required on each patient's archwire.

Methods

[edit]
Upper and lower jaw functional expanders

A typical treatment for incorrectly positioned teeth (malocclusion) takes from one to two years, with braces being adjusted every four to 10 weeks by orthodontists,[31] while university-trained dental specialists are versed in the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of dental and facial irregularities. Orthodontists offer a wide range of treatment options to straighten crooked teeth, fix irregular bites, and align the jaws correctly.[32] There are many ways to adjust malocclusion. In growing patients, there are more options to treat skeletal discrepancies, either by promoting or restricting growth using functional appliances, orthodontic headgear, or a reverse pull facemask. Most orthodontic work begins in the early permanent dentition stage before skeletal growth is completed. If skeletal growth has completed, jaw surgery is an option. Sometimes teeth are extracted to aid the orthodontic treatment (teeth are extracted in about half of all the cases, most commonly the premolars).[33]

Orthodontic therapy may include the use of fixed or removable appliances. Most orthodontic therapy is delivered using appliances that are fixed in place,[34] for example, braces that are adhesively bonded to the teeth. Fixed appliances may provide greater mechanical control of the teeth; optimal treatment outcomes are improved by using fixed appliances.

Fixed appliances may be used, for example, to rotate teeth if they do not fit the arch shape of the other teeth in the mouth, to adjust multiple teeth to different places, to change the tooth angle of teeth, or to change the position of a tooth's root. This treatment course is not preferred where a patient has poor oral hygiene, as decalcification, tooth decay, or other complications may result. If a patient is unmotivated (insofar as treatment takes several months and requires commitment to oral hygiene), or if malocclusions are mild.

The biology of tooth movement and how advances in gene therapy and molecular biology technology may shape the future of orthodontic treatment.[35]

Braces

[edit]
Dental braces

Braces are usually placed on the front side of the teeth, but they may also be placed on the side facing the tongue (called lingual braces). Brackets made out of stainless steel or porcelain are bonded to the center of the teeth using an adhesive. Wires are placed in a slot in the brackets, which allows for controlled movement in all three dimensions.

Apart from wires, forces can be applied using elastic bands,[36] and springs may be used to push teeth apart or to close a gap. Several teeth may be tied together with ligatures, and different kinds of hooks can be placed to allow for connecting an elastic band.[37][36]

Clear aligners are an alternative to braces, but insufficient evidence exists to determine their effectiveness.[38]

Treatment duration

[edit]

The time required for braces varies from person to person as it depends on the severity of the problem, the amount of room available, the distance the teeth must travel, the health of the teeth, gums, and supporting bone, and how closely the patient follows instructions. On average, however, once the braces are put on, they usually remain in place for one to three years. After braces are removed, most patients will need to wear a retainer all the time for the first six months, then only during sleep for many years.[39]

Headgear

[edit]

Orthodontic headgear, sometimes referred to as an "extra-oral appliance", is a treatment approach that requires the patient to have a device strapped onto their head to help correct malocclusion—typically used when the teeth do not align properly. Headgear is most often used along with braces or other orthodontic appliances. While braces correct the position of teeth, orthodontic headgear—which, as the name suggests, is worn on or strapped onto the patient's head—is most often added to orthodontic treatment to help alter the alignment of the jaw, although there are some situations in which such an appliance can help move teeth, particularly molars.

Full orthodontic headgear with headcap, fitting straps, facebow, and elastics

Whatever the purpose, orthodontic headgear works by exerting tension on the braces via hooks, a facebow, coils, elastic bands, metal orthodontic bands, and other attachable appliances directly into the patient's mouth. It is most effective for children and teenagers because their jaws are still developing and can be easily manipulated. (If an adult is fitted with headgear, it is usually to help correct the position of teeth that have shifted after other teeth have been extracted.) Thus, headgear is typically used to treat a number of jaw alignment or bite problems, such as overbite and underbite.[40]

Palatal expansion

[edit]

Palatal expansion can be best achieved using a fixed tissue-borne appliance. Removable appliances can push teeth outward but are less effective at maxillary sutural expansion. The effects of a removable expander may look the same as they push teeth outward, but they should not be confused with actually expanding the palate. Proper palate expansion can create more space for teeth as well as improve both oral and nasal airflow.[41]

Jaw surgery

[edit]

Jaw surgery may be required to fix severe malocclusions.[42] The bone is broken during surgery and stabilized with titanium (or bioresorbable) plates and screws to allow for healing to take place.[43] After surgery, regular orthodontic treatment is used to move the teeth into their final position.[44]

During treatment

[edit]

To reduce pain during the orthodontic treatment, low-level laser therapy (LLLT), vibratory devices, chewing adjuncts, brainwave music, or cognitive behavioral therapy can be used. However, the supporting evidence is of low quality, and the results are inconclusive.[45]

Post treatment

[edit]

After orthodontic treatment has been completed, there is a tendency for teeth to return, or relapse, back to their pre-treatment positions. Over 50% of patients have some reversion to pre-treatment positions within 10 years following treatment.[46] To prevent relapse, the majority of patients will be offered a retainer once treatment has been completed and will benefit from wearing their retainers. Retainers can be either fixed or removable.

Removable retainers

[edit]

Removable retainers are made from clear plastic, and they are custom-fitted for the patient's mouth. It has a tight fit and holds all of the teeth in position. There are many types of brands for clear retainers, including Zendura Retainer, Essix Retainer, and Vivera Retainer.[47] A Hawley retainer is also a removable orthodontic appliance made from a combination of plastic and metal that is custom-molded to fit the patient's mouth. Removable retainers will be worn for different periods of time, depending on the patient's need to stabilize the dentition.[48]

Fixed retainers

[edit]

Fixed retainers are a simple wire fixed to the tongue-facing part of the incisors using dental adhesive and can be specifically useful to prevent rotation in incisors. Other types of fixed retainers can include labial or lingual braces, with brackets fixed to the teeth.[48]

  • Palatal expander
    Palatal expander
  • Orthodontic headgear
    Orthodontic headgear
  • An X-ray taken for skull analysis
    An X-ray taken for skull analysis
  • Top (left) and bottom retainers
    Top (left) and bottom retainers

Clear aligners

[edit]

Clear aligners are another form of orthodontics commonly used today, involving removable plastic trays. There has been controversy about the effectiveness of aligners such as Invisalign or Byte; some consider them to be faster and more freeing than the alternatives.[49]

Training

[edit]

There are several specialty areas in dentistry, but the specialty of orthodontics was the first to be recognized within dentistry.[50] Specifically, the American Dental Association recognized orthodontics as a specialty in the 1950s.[50] Each country has its own system for training and registering orthodontic specialists.

Australia

[edit]

In Australia, to obtain an accredited three-year full-time university degree in orthodontics, one will need to be a qualified dentist (complete an AHPRA-registered general dental degree) with a minimum of two years of clinical experience. There are several universities in Australia that offer orthodontic programs: the University of Adelaide, the University of Melbourne, the University of Sydney, the University of Queensland, the University of Western Australia, and the University of Otago.[51] Orthodontic courses are accredited by the Australian Dental Council and reviewed by the Australian Society of Orthodontists (ASO). Prospective applicants should obtain information from the relevant institution before applying for admission.[52] After completing a degree in orthodontics, specialists are required to be registered with the Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency (AHPRA) in order to practice.[53][54]

Bangladesh

[edit]

Dhaka Dental College in Bangladesh is one of the many schools recognized by the Bangladesh Medical and Dental Council (BM&DC) that offer post-graduation orthodontic courses.[55][56] Before applying to any post-graduation training courses, an applicant must have completed the Bachelor of Dental Surgery (BDS) examination from any dental college.[55] After application, the applicant must take an admissions test held by the specific college.[55] If successful, selected candidates undergo training for six months.[57]

Canada

[edit]

In Canada, obtaining a dental degree, such as a Doctor of Dental Surgery (DDS) or Doctor of Medical Dentistry (DMD), would be required before being accepted by a school for orthodontic training.[58] Currently, there are 10 schools in the country offering the orthodontic specialty.[58] Candidates should contact the individual school directly to obtain the most recent pre-requisites before entry.[58] The Canadian Dental Association expects orthodontists to complete at least two years of post-doctoral, specialty training in orthodontics in an accredited program after graduating from their dental degree.

United States

[edit]

Similar to Canada, there are several colleges and universities in the United States that offer orthodontic programs. Every school has a different enrollment process, but every applicant is required to have graduated with a DDS or DMD from an accredited dental school.[59][60] Entrance into an accredited orthodontics program is extremely competitive and begins by passing a national or state licensing exam.[61]

The program generally lasts for two to three years, and by the final year, graduates are required to complete the written American Board of Orthodontics (ABO) exam.[61] This exam is also broken down into two components: a written exam and a clinical exam.[61] The written exam is a comprehensive exam that tests for the applicant's knowledge of basic sciences and clinical concepts.[61] The clinical exam, however, consists of a Board Case Oral Examination (BCOE), a Case Report Examination (CRE), and a Case Report Oral Examination (CROE).[61] Once certified, certification must then be renewed every ten years.[61] Orthodontic programs can award a Master of Science degree, a Doctor of Science degree, or a Doctor of Philosophy degree, depending on the school and individual research requirements.[62]

United Kingdom

[edit]

Throughout the United Kingdom, there are several Orthodontic Specialty Training Registrar posts available.[63] The program is full-time for three years, and upon completion, trainees graduate with a degree at the Masters or Doctorate level.[63] Training may take place within hospital departments that are linked to recognized dental schools.[63] Obtaining a Certificate of Completion of Specialty Training (CCST) allows an orthodontic specialist to be registered under the General Dental Council (GDC).[63] An orthodontic specialist can provide care within a primary care setting, but to work at a hospital as an orthodontic consultant, higher-level training is further required as a post-CCST trainee.[63] To work within a university setting as an academic consultant, completing research toward obtaining a Ph.D. is also required.[63]

See also

[edit]
  • Orthodontic technology
  • Orthodontic indices
  • List of orthodontic functional appliances
  • Molar distalization
  • Mouth breathing
  • Obligate nasal breathing

Notes

[edit]
  1. ^ Also referred to as orthodontia
  2. ^ "Orthodontics" comes from the Greek orthos ('correct, straight') and -odont- ('tooth').[1]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ "Definition of orthodontics | Dictionary.com". www.dictionary.com. Retrieved 2019-08-28.
  2. ^ "What is orthodontics?// Useful Resources: FAQ and Downloadable eBooks". Orthodontics Australia. Retrieved 2020-08-13.
  3. ^ Lombardo G, Vena F, Negri P, Pagano S, Barilotti C, Paglia L, Colombo S, Orso M, Cianetti S (June 2020). "Worldwide prevalence of malocclusion in the different stages of dentition: A systematic review and meta-analysis". Eur J Paediatr Dent. 21 (2): 115–22. doi:10.23804/ejpd.2020.21.02.05. PMID 32567942.
  4. ^ Whitcomb I (2020-07-20). "Evidence and Orthodontics: Does Your Child Really Need Braces?". Undark Magazine. Retrieved 2020-07-27.
  5. ^ "Controversial report finds no proof that dental braces work". British Dental Journal. 226 (2): 91. 2019-01-01. doi:10.1038/sj.bdj.2019.65. ISSN 1476-5373. S2CID 59222957.
  6. ^ von Cramon-Taubadel N (December 2011). "Global human mandibular variation reflects differences in agricultural and hunter-gatherer subsistence strategies". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 108 (49): 19546–19551. Bibcode:2011PNAS..10819546V. doi:10.1073/pnas.1113050108. PMC 3241821. PMID 22106280.
  7. ^ Rose, Jerome C.; Roblee, Richard D. (June 2009). "Origins of dental crowding and malocclusions: an anthropological perspective". Compendium of Continuing Education in Dentistry (Jamesburg, N.J.: 1995). 30 (5): 292–300. ISSN 1548-8578. PMID 19514263.
  8. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k Proffit WR, Fields Jr HW, Larson BE, Sarver DM (2019). Contemporary orthodontics (Sixth ed.). Philadelphia, PA. ISBN 978-0-323-54387-3. OCLC 1089435881.cite book: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)
  9. ^ a b c d e "A Brief History of Orthodontic Braces – ArchWired". www.archwired.com. 17 July 2019.[self-published source]
  10. ^ Peck S (November 2009). "A biographical portrait of Edward Hartley Angle, the first specialist in orthodontics, part 1". The Angle Orthodontist. 79 (6): 1021–1027. doi:10.2319/021009-93.1. PMID 19852589.
  11. ^ "The Application of the Principles of the Edge- wise Arch in the Treatment of Malocclusions: II.*". meridian.allenpress.com. Retrieved 2023-02-07.
  12. ^ "British Orthodontic Society > Museum and Archive > Collection > Fixed Appliances > Begg". www.bos.org.uk. Retrieved 2023-02-07.
  13. ^ Safirstein D (August 2015). "P. Raymond Begg". American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 148 (2): 206. doi:10.1016/j.ajodo.2015.06.005. PMID 26232825.
  14. ^ Higley LB (August 1940). "Lateral head roentgenograms and their relation to the orthodontic problem". American Journal of Orthodontics and Oral Surgery. 26 (8): 768–778. doi:10.1016/S0096-6347(40)90331-3. ISSN 0096-6347.
  15. ^ Themes UF (2015-01-12). "14: Cephalometric radiography". Pocket Dentistry. Retrieved 2023-02-07.
  16. ^ a b Andrews LF (December 2015). "The 6-elements orthodontic philosophy: Treatment goals, classification, and rules for treating". American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 148 (6): 883–887. doi:10.1016/j.ajodo.2015.09.011. PMID 26672688.
  17. ^ Andrews LF (September 1972). "The six keys to normal occlusion". American Journal of Orthodontics. 62 (3): 296–309. doi:10.1016/s0002-9416(72)90268-0. PMID 4505873. S2CID 8039883.
  18. ^ a b Themes UF (2015-01-01). "31 The straight wire appliance". Pocket Dentistry. Retrieved 2023-02-07.
  19. ^ Andrews LF (July 1979). "The straight-wire appliance". British Journal of Orthodontics. 6 (3): 125–143. doi:10.1179/bjo.6.3.125. PMID 297458. S2CID 33259729.
  20. ^ Phulari B (2013), "Andrews' Straight Wire Appliance", History of Orthodontics, Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd., p. 98, doi:10.5005/jp/books/12065_11, ISBN 9789350904718, retrieved 2023-02-07
  21. ^ Angle EH. Treatment of malocclusion of the teeth. 7th éd. Philadelphia: S.S.White Dental Mfg Cy, 1907
  22. ^ Philippe J (March 2008). "How, why, and when was the edgewise appliance born?". Journal of Dentofacial Anomalies and Orthodontics. 11 (1): 68–74. doi:10.1051/odfen/20084210113. ISSN 2110-5715.
  23. ^ Angle EH (1912). "Evolution of orthodontia. Recent developments". Dental Cosmos. 54: 853–867.
  24. ^ Brodie AG (1931). "A discussion on the Newest Angle Mechanism". The Angle Orthodontist. 1: 32–38.
  25. ^ Angle EH (1928). "The latest and best in Orthodontic Mechanism". Dental Cosmos. 70: 1143–1156.
  26. ^ Brodie AG (1956). "Orthodontic Concepts Prior to the Death of Edward Angle". The Angle Orthodontist. 26: 144–155.
  27. ^ Matasa CG, Graber TM (April 2000). "Angle, the innovator, mechanical genius, and clinician". American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 117 (4): 444–452. doi:10.1016/S0889-5406(00)70164-8. PMID 10756270.
  28. ^ Andrews LF. Straight Wire: The Concept and Appliance. San Diego: LA Wells; 1989.
  29. ^ Andrews LF (1989). Straight wire: the concept and appliance. Lisa Schirmer. San Diego, CA. ISBN 978-0-9616256-0-3. OCLC 22808470.cite book: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)
  30. ^ Roth RH (November 1976). "Five year clinical evaluation of the Andrews straight-wire appliance". Journal of Clinical Orthodontics. 10 (11): 836–50. PMID 1069735.
  31. ^ Fleming PS, Fedorowicz Z, Johal A, El-Angbawi A, Pandis N, et al. (The Cochrane Collaboration) (June 2015). "Surgical adjunctive procedures for accelerating orthodontic treatment". The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2015 (6). John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.: CD010572. doi:10.1002/14651858.cd010572. PMC 6464946. PMID 26123284.
  32. ^ "What is an Orthodontist?". Orthodontics Australia. 5 December 2019.
  33. ^ Dardengo C, Fernandes LQ, Capelli Júnior J (February 2016). "Frequency of orthodontic extraction". Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics. 21 (1): 54–59. doi:10.1590/2177-6709.21.1.054-059.oar. PMC 4816586. PMID 27007762.
  34. ^ "Child Dental Health Survey 2013, England, Wales and Northern Ireland". digital.nhs.uk. Retrieved 2018-03-08.
  35. ^ Atsawasuwan P, Shirazi S (2019-04-10). "Advances in Orthodontic Tooth Movement: Gene Therapy and Molecular Biology Aspect". In Aslan BI, Uzuner FD (eds.). Current Approaches in Orthodontics. IntechOpen. doi:10.5772/intechopen.80287. ISBN 978-1-78985-181-6. Retrieved 2021-05-16.
  36. ^ a b "Elastics For Braces: Rubber Bands in Orthodontics". Orthodontics Australia. 2019-12-15. Retrieved 2020-12-13.
  37. ^ Mitchell L (2013). An Introduction to Orthodontics. Oxford Medical Publications. pp. 220–233.
  38. ^ Rossini G, Parrini S, Castroflorio T, Deregibus A, Debernardi CL (September 2015). "Efficacy of clear aligners in controlling orthodontic tooth movement: a systematic review". The Angle Orthodontist. 85 (5): 881–889. doi:10.2319/061614-436.1. PMC 8610387. PMID 25412265. S2CID 10787375. The quality level of the studies was not sufficient to draw any evidence-based conclusions.
  39. ^ "Dental Braces and Retainers".
  40. ^ Millett DT, Cunningham SJ, O'Brien KD, Benson PE, de Oliveira CM (February 2018). "Orthodontic treatment for deep bite and retroclined upper front teeth in children". The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2 (2): CD005972. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD005972.pub4. PMC 6491166. PMID 29390172.
  41. ^ "Palate Expander". Cleveland Clinic. Retrieved October 29, 2024.
  42. ^ "Jaw Surgery". Modern Orthodontic Clinic in Sammamish & Bellevue. Retrieved 2024-10-03.
  43. ^ Agnihotry A, Fedorowicz Z, Nasser M, Gill KS, et al. (The Cochrane Collaboration) (October 2017). Zbigniew F (ed.). "Resorbable versus titanium plates for orthognathic surgery". The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 10 (10). John Wiley & Sons, Ltd: CD006204. doi:10.1002/14651858.cd006204. PMC 6485457. PMID 28977689.
  44. ^ "British Orthodontic Society > Public & Patients > Your Jaw Surgery". www.bos.org.uk. Retrieved 2019-08-28.
  45. ^ Fleming PS, Strydom H, Katsaros C, MacDonald L, Curatolo M, Fudalej P, Pandis N, et al. (Cochrane Oral Health Group) (December 2016). "Non-pharmacological interventions for alleviating pain during orthodontic treatment". The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2016 (12): CD010263. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD010263.pub2. PMC 6463902. PMID 28009052.
  46. ^ Yu Y, Sun J, Lai W, Wu T, Koshy S, Shi Z (September 2013). "Interventions for managing relapse of the lower front teeth after orthodontic treatment". The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2014 (9): CD008734. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD008734.pub2. PMC 10793711. PMID 24014170.
  47. ^ "Clear Retainers | Maintain Your Hard to Get Smile with Clear Retainers". Retrieved 2020-01-13.
  48. ^ a b Martin C, Littlewood SJ, Millett DT, Doubleday B, Bearn D, Worthington HV, Limones A (May 2023). "Retention procedures for stabilising tooth position after treatment with orthodontic braces". The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2023 (5): CD002283. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD002283.pub5. PMC 10202160. PMID 37219527.
  49. ^ Putrino A, Barbato E, Galluccio G (March 2021). "Clear Aligners: Between Evolution and Efficiency-A Scoping Review". International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 18 (6): 2870. doi:10.3390/ijerph18062870. PMC 7998651. PMID 33799682.
  50. ^ a b Christensen GJ (March 2002). "Orthodontics and the general practitioner". Journal of the American Dental Association. 133 (3): 369–371. doi:10.14219/jada.archive.2002.0178. PMID 11934193.
  51. ^ "How to become an orthodontist". Orthodontics Australia. 26 September 2017.
  52. ^ "Studying orthodontics". Australian Society of Orthodontists. 26 September 2017.
  53. ^ "Specialties and Specialty Fields". Australian Health Practitioners Regulation Agency.
  54. ^ "Medical Specialties and Specialty Fields". Medical Board of Australia.
  55. ^ a b c "Dhaka Dental College". Dhaka Dental College. Archived from the original on October 28, 2017. Retrieved October 28, 2017.
  56. ^ "List of recognized medical and dental colleges". Bangladesh Medical & Dental Council (BM&DC). Retrieved October 28, 2017.
  57. ^ "Orthodontic Facts - Canadian Association of Orthodontists". Canadian Association of Orthodontists. Retrieved 26 October 2017.
  58. ^ a b c "FAQ: I Want To Be An Orthodontist - Canadian Association of Orthodontists". Canadian Association of Orthodontists. Retrieved 26 October 2017.
  59. ^ "RCDC - Eligibility". The Royal College of Dentists of Canada. Archived from the original on 29 October 2019. Retrieved 26 October 2017.
  60. ^ "Accredited Orthodontic Programs - AAO Members". www.aaoinfo.org.
  61. ^ a b c d e f "About Board Certification". American Board of Orthodontists. Archived from the original on 16 February 2019. Retrieved 26 October 2017.
  62. ^ "Accredited Orthodontic Programs | AAO Members". American Association of Orthodontists. Retrieved 26 October 2017.
  63. ^ a b c d e f "Orthodontic Specialty Training in the UK" (PDF). British Orthodontic Society. Retrieved 28 October 2017.
Look up orthodontics in Wiktionary, the free dictionary.
 
Wikimedia Commons has media related to Orthodontics.
 
 
 

 

Check our other pages :

Frequently Asked Questions

Traditional orthodontic treatment often involves waiting until all permanent teeth have erupted, usually in adolescence, before starting comprehensive treatment with braces. Modern approaches emphasize early intervention, sometimes as early as age 7, using techniques like interceptive orthodontics to guide jaw growth and correct issues before they worsen.
Modern practices can identify and address potential dental problems earlier, potentially reducing the need for more extensive treatments later on. Early interventions can help improve bite alignment, prevent overcrowding, and even positively influence facial development. This proactive approach can lead to shorter overall treatment times and improved oral health outcomes.
While early intervention can be beneficial, it may involve additional costs and require longer monitoring periods by an orthodontist. Theres also a possibility of over-treatment if not appropriately assessed by a skilled professional. However, when executed correctly, early care is generally safe and effective in addressing developmental concerns efficiently.